One of the great things about disposable social media like Snapchats is the freedom to say whatever you like when you know there’s no paper trail. And now that Snapchat is more popular among young people than Facebook and Twitter, what’s the next step?
It’s not just disposable social media, but anonymous disposable social media.
Secret, Whisper, YikYak, and Anomo are all jockeying for millennial attention in the anonymous space. Much like a mobile-first Formspring, these apps allow people to exchange anonymous messages with their friends or nearby strangers. And they’ve stirred up their share of drama.
Advertisers Confess Interest in Secret Sharing Apps
But anonymous sharing apps are more than a rumor mill. They signal that advertisers need to expand their targeting data beyond simple demographics, get more creative with new tools like social interest, GPS, and content data, and consequently get more relevant.
Millennials have advertisers warming up to these largely untested anonymous apps: MTV just wrapped their first campaign for a new show on Whisper —execs placed big bets on the platform for its established reach with 17-24 year olds. And Hulu has been eager to get in on the action, with its launch of Whisper’s first advertising campaign for its TV show “Deadbeat.”
Demographic Targeting, Once Again, Isn’t the Answer
But despite all the hype, not everyone is on board quite yet. For some, anonymous sharing apps like Secret are missing a crucial piece of the digital advertising puzzle—accessible targeting information. Secrecy, the very crux of these apps, becomes problematic for advertisers who want to find their audiences. But not every ad exec is too worked up about it: some argue that having the GPS data from users, as well as the content of their posts, is in fact more useful than knowing a user’s age.
While the anonymity of these apps has made audience targeting more difficult in some respects, they can also push the ad industry to place an emphasis on overall privacy in advertising. Afterall, it was the anonymous and private nature of these apps— something that’s hard to come by in our digital age— that attracted users in the first place. The popularity of these apps is a signal to Madison Avenue that it’s time to leverage more private forms of targeting, whether it’s public social data like we use here at 140 Proof, or the content of users’ posts as in Whisper. You might even be surprised by a more precise outcome.
August 19, 2014 - 9 hours ago
Media planners at big media agencies can be a tough crowd to break into, especially for first-time sellers. It might not be a stretch to liken top-tier ad buyers to the popular kids in high school. But the industry sites SellerCrowd and BuyerCrowd have sellers and planners passing around trade secrets like folded-up notes in 4th period Algebra II.
Since its inception in 2011, SellerCrowd has provided those peddling ad space a means to clear obstacles to pitching. Rather than counting on their own, possibly limited network to find who buys for what brand, SellerCrowd helps salespeople figure out who to call on. SellerCrowd has been able to maintain this secretive network by requiring its users to use a LinkedIn login to sign up for the site to verify that they’re actually sellers themselves. If it turns out that they’re not actual sellers (often buyers miming sellers to see what’s being said on the site), then it’s tough luck for them—they’re kicked off the site.
Jumping on SellerCrowd’s success, a sibling site has cropped up for digital ad buyers— BuyerCrowd. BuyerCrowd is the same as SellerCrowd, but in reverse— media buyers can swap trade secrets about the sellers that they closely work with. Need to know who’s buying for Acme? Use SellerCrowd. Need to know whose meeting to take? You want BuyerCrowd. All in all, these sites have sustained a community of 20,000 ad buyers and sellers gossiping about their contacts for the benefit of their work.
SellerCrowd, BuyerCrowd, and Programmatic: All Signs Point to Efficiency
These communities are emblematic of more than just business gossip: they also signify major shifts in the way in which the ad buying business is conducted. New anonymous exchanges like these sites have equipped everyone to make faster and more efficient transactions, threatening to kill off the traditional two-hour lunch. It’s hard not to take note of parallels to the overall digital shifts in advertising too, as an increasing number of players also turn to tech with programmatic advertising. With faster, automated transactions empowered by insights from social data, buyers and sellers can still take the two-hour lunch with all the time they save.
August 18, 2014 - 1 day ago
Why might even the most savvy TV ad exec be glancing over his shoulder these days? Could it be because the most-watched video on YouTube has over 2 billion views and counting? Is it Mary Meeker’s latest deck? Or is it simply because fewer people are buying TVs?
Mobile and Online Video: Impending Marketing World Domination
By now, it’s safe to say we’re well-aware of just how important online video is. Mobile video consumption has surged a mind-boggling 532 percent, and marketers are paying attention. An ever-increasing portion of the video content we watch is online, whether it’s catching the latest headlines on CNN.com or (no shame here) sneaking in a few “kitten sees its reflection for the first time” videos during a slow day at the office. And the pace of mobile video adoption isn’t slowing down anytime soon.
Reaching Key Audiences on TV Is Getting Tougher
Even without the influence of mobile and online video’s rise, advertisers are beginning to look where audiences are, and increasingly, that’s not just on TV. Starcom MediaVest, a top ad buying firm, reports that it’s shifted a lot of its ad dollars from traditional television to where some of its coveted audiences are. According to one Nielsen study, 30 percent of online video users are 18-34 years old (a tricky demographic to reach), whereas only 21 percent of that age group up make up TV viewers. What’s more, Nielsen also found that online video ads have a bigger impact and greater reach than their old TV counterparts.
TV Ad Targeting Now Taking Cues from Mobile
Online and mobile video advertising campaigns are often cited as being successful because they are interactive for the viewer. In contrast, traditional TV advertising can seem one-dimensional. So what are TV advertisers to do? TV isn’t out of the (video) picture quite yet, but you can expect it to take a few cues from its digital counterparts to get a handle on the advertising market. The first way it might go about that? Better targeting its ads towards consumers. While the effectiveness of programmatic ad buying for TV is still up for debate, it’s likely that it will still shape at least some of how we view ads in the future. And since we know that personalization is the new everything, it comes as no surprise that some TV advertisers have already begun experimenting with targeted television like its digital counterpart. It’s pretty clear that online and mobile video are shaking up the TV advertising ecosystem — we’re excited to watch what comes of it.
- CNET: Global video index
- comScore: 2014 online video rankings
- B2C: online video rankings
- eMarketer: Mobile video viewers and data plans
- eMarketer: mobile and TV advertising
August 8, 2014 - 1 week ago
As we head into the Digiday Retail Summit today, here’s some retail news that’s been on our minds.
By the way, if you’re at DRS, look for us on Monday in the Grand Ballroom. We’ll be giving a bite-sized summary of our research whitepaper “A Network for Every Interest.” Read the entire whitepaper here.
Learn three new tactics retailers are trying in-store based on their own business data.
Sometimes it seems like people talk about “data” as if everyone knows what that means. Learn the basics of data, as advertisers use it.
If you’ve been hearing about programmatic lately, you’ve probably also been hearing a lot of jargon. Demystify the most common terms.
A new batch of successful, digital-only e-commerce companies like Nasty Gal, Birchbox, and Bonobos are opening their first stores this year.
Following new VP of Retail’s plan to triple Apple’s footprint in China, a new store opened in Chongqing yesterday.
Want to talk more about the interesting challenges facing retailers or about our research? Find Matt Rosenberg (@CanonFodder) at Digiday Retail Summit or tweet us at @140proof.
July 27, 2014 - 3 weeks ago
Over the past few weeks of The World Cup, we’ve witnessed spectacular goals, some fancy footwork with a soccer ball, and one “did that just happen?” shoulder biting incident. We’d say it’s been one of the best World Cups yet, and as we’ve whittled the brackets down to just four teams, lingering on the sidelines is another tournament taking place between social media giants: Facebook and Twitter. While The World Cup has stiff competition from other sporting events like the Super Bowl, which garnered an impressive 24.9 million tweets in 2014, the World Cup’s social engagement has dominated news feeds and Twitter feeds.
Both Twitter and Facebook caught on to the potential around the World Cup, before the whistles even blew by creating specific hubs for World Cup engagement. Facebook even crafted a special “Trending in the World Cup” section, as well as an interactive map for fans to check out where other users are viewing the game. Not to be outdone, Twitter boasted in a blogpost that “the only real-time #WorldCup global viewing party will be on Twitter, where you can track all 64 matches, experience every goal and love every second, both on and off the pitch.” Twitter’s real star of the show? Its rollout of “hashflags” that let every soccer fan show their patriotic pride when they included their country’s hashtag in a tweet. Let the games begin!
Facebook’s star lineup
In spite of a staggering 500 million soccer fans on the social network, Facebook is weak where Twitter has its strongest asset: real time engagement. Facebook’s trending topics, rolled out earlier this year, often lag behind events in games and are so targeted that they fail to capture the larger conversation.
Even if Facebook is the underdog there, they’ve certainly found other ways to drive their popularity with soccer fanatics. The players themselves seem particularly taken with the site as a means of connecting with their supporters. Case in point: remember that bite seen ‘round the world? Sure, there were plenty of witty Twitter reactions. But when it came time for Luis Suarez to apologize for his actions, he took to Facebook to write his condolences about his Italian snack:
With 7.9 million fans on Facebook, Suarez was certainly able to get a lot of people listening. Other players have followed suit (minus a remorseful biting incident, of course) and have utilized the platform as the best way to connect with their adoring fans. Is that enough to stand up to Twitter, though?
Twitter’s strategic gameplay
With engagement seemingly higher than ever on Twitter, there’s a lot to talk about how the social network has developed its World Cup strategy. But the World Cup’s biggest Twitter win was actually born out of team USA’s crushing loss to Belgium. Even though they lost, US goalie Tim Howard has become an internet
sensation ever since memes and #ThingsTimHowardCouldSave went viral on Twitter. Could Howard have just saved the social media game for Twitter, too?
This year’s champion?
Facebook put up a good fight, but we have to hand it to Twitter here. The site is simply unrivaled when it comes to mirroring the fast-paced nature of soccer itself, and fans, players, and the media alike have all taken notice. While the real winner of this year’s World Cup has yet to be decided, a hearty congratulations to Twitter for championing the World Cup of Social Media!
July 11, 2014 - 1 month ago
In the marketing and advertising world, business jargon is all in a day’s work. Just between nine and noon you might have had to “ping” your co-worker a dozen times, “push the needle forward” in a brainstorm session, or check in with colleagues on what’s “coming down the pipeline” for new business. In the ad tech world the buzzy nature of business speak has been taken to new heights. The jargon and complicated vocabulary associated with the industry has made an already complicated field seemingly impenetrable. Given that programmatic advertising is often heralded as the future of advertising (this year, eMarketer predicted that advertisers will spend $3.36 billion on RTB, up from $2 billion in 2012) we think it’s important that everyone have a better sense of what this new technology is really all about — minus the jargon.
What does programmatic have to do with me?
Remember the early days of internet advertising when surfing the internet meant you were subject to any number of annoying, flashing banner ads? That jarring experience is thankfully on its way out for all but the jankiest of websites. Programmatic advertising has modernized digital advertising by making the process of buying digital ad space more efficient, and as a result provides more relevant ads to people like you.
Here’s a vocabulary primer to get down before we dive in much deeper:
Media Buyers: This one’s straight-forward. The buyers in a programmatic ad buy are the people who are buying ad space on a website. A good example might be a retailer like Nordstrom.
Publishers: Here’s the other half of the equation. Think of them as being similar to publishers in the traditional sense. They’re the people who are publishing content on a platform —whether a social media site like Facebook or a magazine website like The New Yorker —and need to generate revenue for their site. In this case, they do so by selling off ad space, or ad inventory.
Data Management Platform (DMP): This is where users and publishers meet in the middle. A DMP is essentially a database for user data that then organizes that information in ways that advertisers, publishers, and other businesses can use. In short, by using the data stored in a DMP, ads are better targeted towards users.
Care to explain how that all happens?
In a nutshell, programmatic ad buying uses software and machine based programming to replace the typical mechanisms of buying digital advertising, like negotiations and business deals. By automating this interaction between buyers and publishers, programmatic advertising has made digital advertising more efficient and a more effective modernized process.
These digital transactions occur using a variety of technologies, the most common of which is called real-time bidding, or RTB. RTB is more than just another acronym in the marketing world. It’s the way that digital advertisements, sometimes personalized, are typically served to you. You can think of RTB as a real-time “auction.” In the milliseconds before a publisher’s web page loads, your ad impression (essentially information about you and the page you’re about to view the ad on) is loaded onto an ad exchange. Brands then ‘bid’ for their ad to be placed in front of you on that site, depending on the computer’s determined “worth” of your impression. RTB and personalized advertising is part of why big data has become so important to the ad industry as well— much of programmatic is reliant on big data stored in DMPs so that they can effectively target their ads to users.
All of this takes place in different places depending on who is spending the money. The buyers, specifically advertisers and agencies, use an ad exchange called a “demand side platform” or DSP to automate this RTB process. Alternatively, publishers use an ad exchanges called “supply side platforms” or SSPs to sell the ad space on their site.
So where does that leave Don Draper?
There’s no need to worry about your favorite ad man just yet. While it’s true that programmatic advertising is going to play an increasingly large role in the advertising world and computers may replace some ad buying jobs, advertising will always need human strategy and creativity to drive its success. That’s something that programmatic and machine driven advertising can’t replicate —at least not quite yet.
July 2, 2014 - 1 month ago
Ad creatives are a lucky bunch so far as careers go. They get to showcase their creative chops for 30 seconds during the Super Bowl, have entire TV shows written about them, and each year, they flock to the stunning French Riviera to celebrate the best of their industry at Cannes Lions. It’s a cumulative conference done in such spectacular style that few other industries’ annual gathering —maybe aside from The Oscars—can’t really measure up. And while the festival bills itself as honoring creativity, this year’s celebration, which ended just this past weekend, should have included another headline alongside it: discussing the potential of ad tech. Industry analysts noted that ad tech firms and players were just as present at this year’s awards. It wasn’t just the business deals that they brought to the table, either. The heightened ad tech presence this year became emblematic of advertising community’s shifting dynamic, and how it’s quickly bridging the divide between Madison Avenue and Silicon Valley.
A Glimpse Into The Future of Advertising?
Traditionally, Cannes has been a playground for advertising execs to showcase their best work. This past week though, Silicon Valley had just a big of a presence—and they weren’t there to just sip rosé on the French Coast. Instead, their presence was both strategic and symbolic. Big tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Yahoo! crowded in along the coast to boast about their ad offerings and reach. Ad tech companies like Rubicon Project attended to nail down business deals and showcase their digital platforms for advertising. And in Cannes’ “cyber” category, or its digital advertising field, there was a 39% increase in submissions this year from last year.
All of these trends suggest just how integral technology has become to advertising, and how it’s shaking up what once was an archaic process. One of this year’s biggest takeaways? There’s no need for the Don Drapers of the world to be timid when it comes to advertising technology— these new advancements in how ads are bought, sold, and placed will only help to boost business and solidify an agency’s offerings to a brand.
Cannes - The Next SXSW?
If this year’s increase in media attention around Cannes Lions is any indication, Cannes has not only shifted in its attendees, but within those paying attention as well. Once a niche industry event, it’s clear that Cannes Lions is rapidly developing into a more mainstream event. Cannes Lions was once limited to recapping the past year in advertising. Now it forecasts what we can expect from the next year as well. This shift parallels another mainstream tech conference, SXSW, and its own meteoric rise. And like SXSW, which began as a conference for the film and interactive industries, Cannes Lions may soon become a showcase not only for the ad world, but also for exciting, emerging technology. At this rate, who knows— with all these changes within the ad world and the conference itself, maybe we’ll see Cannes Lions 2015 decorated with a few indie band acts a la SXSW, too.
June 25, 2014 - 1 month ago
For consumers, data visualization often seems like a distant buzzword only applicable to marketers or merely another trend. A lot of us aren’t even sure what data visualization means outside of marketing jargon. In its simplest form, data visualization is code that sits on a huge database of numbers and transforms those numbers into images that allow you to interact with them. Data visualization can be implemented across disciplines and in a number of cool ways, too. Some of data visualization’s greatest hits have documented and visualized entire NBA game movements and even the history of the 20th century.
There’s no need for data visualization to be relegated to the pages of websites and marketing reports, though: it actually has a huge impact on consumers and brands alike, especially in retail. Data visualization has essentially become a new way of putting “big data” to good use for brands. Retailers are starting to use data visualization in very tangible ways as a means of competing with digital and e-commerce giants — and it’s affecting consumers in a very real way.
Many brick-and-mortar stores leverage data visualization as a means of competing with their e-commerce rivals. Nearly everyone is aware of the well-documented infringement of digital on the in-store shopping experience. A recent study from Deloitte only serves to emphasize this fact —it found that digital technologies, like mobile, social and more, influence 36 percent of $1.1 trillion of in-store sales. That number will likely increase to 50 percent by the end of 2014. So how does data visualization fit into retail’s struggling digital equation? Brands are beginning to implement it in a number of different ways as a means of keeping up with rapid shifts in technology and e-commerce. Check out a few of the ways below that consumers expect to see data visualization come into play in their brick-and-mortar experience:
Retailers are now putting the power of location analytics to work within the in-store retail experience, much in the same way that e-commerce has leveraged it. One of the best examples of this is popular jeweler, Alex and Ani. By using their stores’ existing security cameras, Alex and Ani has been able to monitor their customers’ shopping behaviors and patterns, and modify the layout of their store accordingly. For example, if they notice that an item is not picking up many sales because it’s in a lower-trafficked area, they may move it to a more frequently visited area instead. The next time you step into a store, consider that stock may not have been placed in each location merely for aesthetics. Instead, there’s a good chance that a savvy retailer has carefully laid out their inventory in a specific way due to data visualization.
Social data showcase
As it turns out, everything that you like and share on social media isn’t just for your friends to ogle at. It’s actually become useful data for retailers to determine a better, more personalized in-store retail experience for you. Take Pinterest and Nordstroms’ recent collaboration. Nordstroms pulled the data from their Pinterest community and highlighted specific merchandise in their store based on their most popular pins. It’s just one example of how brick-and-mortar stores have been able to incorporate social feedback into an in-store experience with the aid of data visualization. Consequently this combination has strengthen their ability to compete with e-commerce sites.
Price check in 5 minutes…
E-commerce sites are notorious for toying with their prices all day long depending on data on consumer shopping habits and variables like the time of day, weather, and more. Now brick-and-mortar stores are aiming to do the same as retailers embrace data that allows them to make speedy, digital price changes. Thanks to digital price displays within stores, customers may want to double check an item to see if the price shifted since the last time they went down the aisle. Clearly data visualization is becoming an integral part of brick-and-mortar strategy as it aims to stay relevant in an age of e-commerce, and it will only continue to affect our shopping habits as consumers.
June 25, 2014 - 1 month ago